-----------------------







-----------------------

Archive Introduction


UN Performance Problems

UN Management Accountability Struggles


Where is the Rule of Law?

Inadequate UN Oversight

Recent Developments

 
  

 

 


Overview Quotes 2           

                                                                                                                   

            

Overview of IO Watch Archive Quotes II

1995-2004

 

 

 

75.        "Senior U.N. officials have been corrupted: not by power and ambition but by their tax-free salaries and their comfortable lives.  Servants and secretaries help them get through the day and perform their non-existent jobs.  All they want is for this to continue until they retire …"

Tom Bethell, National Review (US), August 28, 1995.

                                                                                                               

 

 

76.        "When it comes to organization and supervision, [43 percent of UN staff responding]  consider that their supervisor's performance is inadequate … or downright bad. Professional staff are the most concerned. …

… On the whole, staff members want better -- i.e., qualified -- managers, more accountability within the Organization and more personal initiative and responsibility."

"Picture of UN staff: A worldwide survey: Organized by UN staff for UN staff", Geneva,  25 September 1995,  pp. 3, 5, 10, 13-14.

                                                                         

 

 

77.     "… Efforts must be made to do away with the widespread tendency of staff, even in key positions, to shun responsibility and accountability.  OIOS backs measures taken by the Department of Administration and Management to achieve this goal and will focus its own recommendations to management accordingly. …

    … Many UN managers are not used to and seem to be quite reluctant to accept criticism, particularly when it comes to applying accountability criteria rather than settling for the promise that some specific problems won't recur.  This feature of the United Nations culture must be changed if we are ever to develop staff awareness and acceptance of responsibility and accountability.  United Nations managers must stop being defensive and enter into a critical dialogue with OIOS."  

"Report of the Secretary-General on the activities of the [OIOS]", UN document  A/50/459, 2 October 1995, in "Preface", by the first head ot the OIOS, Mr. Karl Paschke.

                                                                       

 

 

78.        "For years Western governments have complained about the lack of accountability prevailing in UN organizations, but in practice they have tolerated a degree of opacity that would be considered totally unacceptable for any civil service in a democracy. …

            [No] amount of exhortation – as the years have proved – can compensate for the lack of routine inspection under established rules of ‘open government.’  Evaluation would require … built-in procedures requiring the UN bureaucracies to respond to criticisms.  So ingrained is the collusion between the permanent representatives to these organizations and the secretariats that a majority for such an initiative among the UN membership would be difficult though not impossible to muster.  But many UN staff members would welcome more rigorous scrutiny …”

Rosemary Righter, Utopia lost: The United Nations and world order, Twentieth Century Fund, New York, 1995, pp. 280-281.   [emphasis added]

                                                                                 

 

 

79.        "'United Nations management' has been termed an oxymoron, a juxtaposition of incompatibles.  Over the past fifty years, there have been various attempts to strengthen United Nations programmes and improve their management, but they have not been well implemented.

The General Assembly insisted very forcefully in December 1993 that a new,  'transparent and effective system of accountability and responsibility' be established … 

            … The future status and credibility of the United Nations require it to demonstrate that it is a learning organization which will skillfully and flexibly manage its limited resources to produce results …

The current effort is undoubtedly the best, and possibly the last, opportunity to establish a strong management culture and performance emphasis in the United Nations.

… At the same time, this enormous process of change is being done with modest resources, against entrenched habits of mediocre management, and in the midst of continuing operational and financial turbulence …"

 Joint Inspection Unit, "Management in the United Nations: Work in progress",   UN document A/50/507, 1995, "Executive Summary", p. v. [emphasis added]

 

 

80.        "The [Integrated Management Information System (IMIS), approved by the General Assembly in 1988,]  moved forward with painful slowness for years, due primarily to management indecision and a lack of proper support to the contractor (resulting in significant cost overruns and an expected final total cost of some $76 million … Meanwhile, the antiquated existing systems have continued to provide inaccurate, tardy, inconsistent, and inadequate financial and personnel data, which could rarely be used by managers in daily operations. Recently, however, with stronger leadership and following a 'complete reprogramming and rebudgeting exercise' and a review by the Board of Auditors, IMIS may now be ready to reach a 'critical mass' of implementation …"

"Management in the United Nations: Work in progress", Joint Inspection Unit,  UN document A/50/507,1995, para. 54.                                                                                                                                                                                               

 

81.            Randolph Kent's study of international disaster relief is a considered, compassionate, and pessimistic assessment of the whole sorry history of ad hoc expedients and what he politely calls 'institutional insecurities.'  He points out that it took the Nigerian civil war (which claimed, without  UN intervention as peacekeeper, perhaps a million casualties …), the Peruvian earthquake, and the combination of war with natural disaster in Bangladesh -- all of which occurred between 1967 and 1971 -- 'to bring the simmering issues of the United Nations' role in emergency operations to the boil.'  Unproductively on the boil it has remained.  Since 1971, no fewer than ten UN disaster units have been created, each exerting its claim to be treated as contact point, fund-raiser, coordinator, and assessor, each with a mandate in excess of its capacities.  Alongside these are at least a dozen national disaster units, and an increasingly sophisticated, relatively well coordinated and flexibly managed assortment of voluntary organizations."

Rosemary Righter, Utopia lost: The United Nations and world order, Twentieth Century Fund, New York, 1995, p. 290.  [Note: The quote is from Randolph C. Kent, Anatomy of disaster relief: The international network in action, Frances Pinter, London, 1987.

                                                                                   

 

 

82.            Introduction: A good idea fallen among thieves

The UN has the media relations of a 1950s state bureaucracy.  It doesn't  like reporters looking into its inner workings, and it threatens dire penalties to staff found leaking information to the media.

Time and time again, when journalists have exposed scandals in the UN, senior officials set up an enquiry -- into who leaked!"

Ian Williams, The UN for beginners, Writers and Readers Publishing, New York, 1995, p. 1.

 

 

83.        "With a budgeting process as antiquated and arcane as the UN's, the dearth of training  --  the key to instituting a truly cost-effective management culture  --  is shocking.  Managers often start out with no notion of how to administer their own office budgets.  "Management training', confined mostly to the UN's Performance Appraisal System, still takes a back seat to language-training programmes which dominate staff improvement time.  Managerial expertise is but a faint consideration in the promotion of managers at any level, including the Secretary-General."

Morris B. Abram, "Save the UN", The Geneva Post, No. 9, May 17-22, 1996.

                                                                                   

 

 

84.            "Halfway through his term and answerable only to Member States, [Mr. Karl Paschke, the UN's first "Inspector General"] can look forward to a comfortable couple of years … But United Nations observers are beginning to ask what has been achieved in exchange for … a free hand for Paschke.  The answer is not encouraging.

 … the original conception of Paschke's post was a combination of Grand Inquisitor and Super Sleuth.  The final product, insiders say, falls far short of either. …  "The problem is that half the OIOS staff do not know anything about the UN" we are told, "and the other half know everything there is to know but are part of the establishment and they are not going to make waves."  The results of OIOS's travails are paltry indeed ….

There are whispers that senior staff need not fear their peccadilloes will be exposed. Paschke's Finest, it is said, will rake no muck above a certain level of political or bureaucratic influence." 

"Diplomatic pouch", Diplomatic World Bulletin, July 29-August 6, 1996, p. 10. 

                                                                                   

 

 

85.        "The image of the UN is disastrously bad not only for the public at large, but even among diplomats or delegates to the U.N. who are in constant touch with the Secretariat members.  It is extremely bad among the few reasonable and honest 'senior U.N. officers' who remain in the service of the Organization.  One of them told Maggie O'Kane, the well-known investigative reporter (who has also won the 'Journalist of the Year' award) that, 'This is the most corrupt organization I have ever worked for; everybody is on the take.'"

Houshang Ameri, Politics of staffing the United Nations Secretariat, Major Concepts in Politics and Political Theory, Vol. 8, Peter Lang, New York, 1996, p. 399. The concluding quote is from The Guardian (UK), August 26 1993.

                                                                                   

 

 

 

86.        "In 1996, Andre Sirois, a legal translator at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, found himself surrounded by rampant kickbacks, bribes, and mismanagement. … He reported it all to … [the OIOS. Its] representatives came out to investigate, and Sirois encouraged his colleagues to speak with them.  In short order, he and the other complainers were effectively fired … despite good performance reviews and a shortage of qualified staff ….

When the firings began, Sirois and two colleagues flew secretly to New York City … [at their own expense, but no senior UN officials] would listen to them.  Eventually, the OIOS substantiated the corruption at the ICTR and the entire senior administrative staff was fired, but it was too late for the whistle-blowers -- their job contracts had expired.  Sirois appealed the nonrenewal of his contract, and seven years later, he won.  But there was a catch: … his contract carried no expectation of renewal."

Corine Hegland, "Whistle-blowing at the United Nations", National Journal (US), March 12, 2005.

                                                           

 

 

87.        "Real reform requires an ongoing search for excellence … above all, in the performance of our staff.  In this I [new Secretary-General Kofi Annan] will not compromise.  I expect from each and every staff member, at all levels, a total commitment to excellence.  I expect the Secretariat to work together and at all times to function properly. …

I pledge to you today that we will develop a new management culture in the Organization.  Our senior managers across the world must understand their obligation to properly manage the staff -- the human resources -- entrusted to their care.  It is my intention to hold my managers accountable for providing the full range of career support to their staff in their day-to-day work. …

… We are the United Nations, and we believe our organization can fulfil the vision of our Charter … The excellence of our performance will turn our detractors into supporters.  We all know [that] … nobody argues with success."

"Secretary-General urges staff to strive for excellence, stressing UN performance will turn detractors into supporters", SG/SM/6140 of 9 January 1997, pp. 1,3, 4.   [Note: See, however, the entry below on accountability deficiencies eight years later, of 17 May 2005.]
 

 

 

88.        Sins of member states:

Secretariat staff resent …member state interference in … their daily work … [their micromanagement of]  the hiring and promotion of Secretariat personnel. …. [and of]  Secretariat budgeting, …. too often …seeking to control the minor details of spending allocations. ….

Sins of the Secretariat:

 ….  Member states contend that ineffective  --  some would say nonexistent  -- managerial practices throughout the Secretariat have led to inefficient use of the [UN resources] …; a staff unaccountable for its actions and prone to delegate upwards; … a lack of transparency in Secretariat decision making [on] policy issues, personnel, and budget expenditures. … much of the information that is provided is not timely or readable. … Overall, inefficiency and lack of accountability within the Secretariat, whether perceived or real, have invited member state micromanagement. "

"Making UN reform work: Improving member state-Secretariat relations", Report of the twenty-eighth United Nations issues conference, The Stanley Foundation, February 21-23, 1997, pp. 2, 14-16.

 

 

89.   "The General Assembly …

I.2.      Regrets with deep concern that further progress in the implementation of the adopted [human resources] strategy has not been achieved …;

3.              Regrets the unsuccessful efforts to develop a management environment and culture in the Organization …

II.   Reaffirming its resolution 48/218A of … [1993], in particular ...  ensuring that programme managers are accountable for the effective management of human resources allocated to them, …

2.            Requests the Secretary-General to … [impose] sanctions in cases of demonstrated mismanagement of staff and willful neglect of or disregard for established rules and procedures …

3.            …to issue specific administrative instructions … [including] sanctions  …for any financial loss suffered by the United Nations as a result of gross negligence …;

4.              Deplores the high number of exceptions to the established procedures for … [human resource decisions], in particular in the [personnel office, OHRM];

6.   Welcomes the intention of the Secretary-General  to streamline [administration] … through delegation of authority to programme managers and to ensure, before delegating such authority, that well-designed mechanisms of accountability, including the necessary internal monitoring and control procedures…, are put in place …"

"Human resources management", General Assembly resolution 51/226 of 25 April 1997, Part I, paras. 2-4, Part II, first preambular and paras. and 2-4, and 6.  [emphasis added]

 

 

90.        "The General Assembly, …

Expressing deep concern about the persistence of problems and defects observed by the Board of Auditors in the financial administration and management of the United Nations; …

11. Notes with deep concern the incidents of fraud and presumed fraud reported by the Board of Auditors;

12. Requests the Secretary-General and the executive heads … to take the disciplinary actions necessary in cases of proven fraud and to enhance the individual accountability of United Nations personnel, including through stronger managerial control; …"

"Financial reports and audited financial statements, and reports of the Board of Auditors," General Assembly resolution 51/225 of 16 May 1997.   [emphasis added]

 

 

91.     "UN employees -- who request anonymity because they fear they will suffer more professional harm than the corrupt officials they want to expose -- have provided numerous accounts of officials' being transferred rather than dismissed after being caught breaking the rules.

This happens frequently in cases of sexual harassment, nepotism, and occasionally violence, according to these accounts. Whistle-blowers are neither encouraged nor rewarded."

Barbara Crossette, "In war on corruption and waste, UN confronts well-entrenched foe", International Herald Tribune, 3 November 1997.  

                                                                                   

 

 

92.        "OHRM will convene … a task force of experts [to make a] 'clear delineation of responsibilities' [which] is expected to lead to a reduction in micro-management.

[The IDR then notes that] Micromanagement by intergovernmental bodies is an index of the lack of trust between the majority of delegations and the UN Secretariat. … [If this trend is to be reversed] there must be a much clearer conceptualization of change, a balanced explanation of implications, and an absolute sincerity of purpose.  The current perception of the Secretariat among many delegations is that in terms of personnel policy it is confused, does not understand the full implications of what is proposed, and has a hidden agenda. …

In pushing for reorientation, Ms. Salim speaks some home truths… 'there is 'widespread staff distrust of management' and the UN's 'organizational culture is one in which advancement is generally expected on the basis of longevity rather than performance.'"

"UN personnel chief reviewing all aspects of management in bid to simplify controls, delegate authority,", International Documents Review, 16 February 1998, p. 2.  


 

 

93.        "In a rather scathing [1998] report, the General Assembly's Advisory Committee on Administrative and Financial Questions (ACABQ) has dismissed the 'concept paper' … submitted by the Secretariat on 'Reducing and refocusing of non-programme costs.' … 

Rather than call for yet another report, the ACABQ suggests that a practical move at this stage might be to 'set aside a preoccupation with concept and theory … to concentrate on … specific new measures to increase the efficiency and confirm the results arising out of the implementation of new measures as well as those initiated prior to the current exercise." 

"Advisory Committee rejects "non-programme costs" report", International Documents Review, 16 March 1998, page 5.     
     

94.        "The job of secretary-general at the United Nations is not unlike that of a medieval pope.

 …  Until recently [Kofi Annan] … seemed to have momentum on his side.  But his successful diplomatic crusade in Iraq … [is] unraveling … the UN's monitors have been hustled out of Congo … the hard-won peace in Angola is at vanishing point … [and] the … [UNHCR] faces unexpected allegations of corruption. …

Sooner or later … the UN will have to change … into the 'narrower and deeper' organization reformers have always wished it would be.

Mr. Annan is nervous about the idea of a much narrower UN …

[Yet]… the failure by most popes to face up to the abuses within their own organizations opened up the way to reformation of a more devastating type.  Or as one insider puts it: "If the UN's friends do not reform it, its enemies will.'"

"Reforming the United Nations: Pope Kofi's unruly flock", The Economist, August 8th, 1998,  pp. 17-19.

                                                                       

 

 

95.        " … The [1998 OIOS annual] report is a guide to a variety of UN scandals … 

"The Second UN Conference on Human Settlements … is perhaps the crown jewel … [with] … an uncovered deficit in the range of $2 million … The Conference 'never submitted a cost plan for the use of the $8.2 million in voluntary contributions … and accounting for donor contributions was incomplete. [OIOS does not address the question of how this situation developed and was allowed to continue.]   

"OIOS has investigated  … an UNCTAD staff member …  who bilked the agency of over $600,000 by claiming travel and per diem expenses for non-existent experts attending imaginary meetings.  [OIOS does not … mention]  that this imaginative individual was caught only because he was hospitalized for a time and could not keep up the charade.  This is surely material for a Hollywood comedy.]"

"Reviewing 3+ years of work, [OIOS] sees continuing problems - but reforms are afoot," International Documents Review, 2 November 1998, pp. 1-4.

                                                                                               

 

 

96.        "The General Assembly

            IV.  Delegation of authority and accountability …

3.            … notes that no comprehensive system of accountability and responsibility has been established; …

10.            Reiterates its request to the Secretary-General [of 25 April 1997] to enhance managerial accountability with respect to human resources management decisions, including imposing sanctions in case of demonstrated mismanagement of staff and willful neglect of or disregard for established rules and procedures, while safeguarding the right of due process of all staff members, including managers." 

"Human resources management," General Assembly resolution 53/221 of 23 April 1999.   [emphasis added]

                                                                                   

 

 

97.        "The United Nations of today … is a better Organization in many respects than, say, five years ago, and enhanced oversight has played its part in that change.

However, further improvement within the United Nations is still necessary in many ways.  Internal controls are not strong enough yet; accountability continues to be blurred and misunderstood; delegation of authority must be effectively executed; and human resources management is in need of further reform, particularly in … the system of personnel assessment. … The operational and psychological distance between Headquarters and the field, that is, the other duty stations … remains a problem."

Karl T. Paschke, Under-Secretary-General and first head of the OIOS, in "Report of the Secretary-General on the activities of the Office of Internal Oversight Services" A/54/393 of 23 September 1999, Preface.                                                                                                                                                                                                                

 

 

98.        "It is not easy to admit the truth of Srebrenica, the Bosnian town where [in 1995] thousands of Muslim men were executed and hundreds buried alive …  But in its report on Monday, the United Nations accepts its share of the blame. ….

…. In the recent case of East Timor, the council supported the idea of a UN referendum on independence but refused to send troops to deter a bloodbath that was widely predicted.

Sometimes the United Nations' failure is built into its structure.  Where a permanent member of the Security Council opposes intervention, no action will be authorized … But in cases where the Security Council does approve action, it is fair to insist that it be serious.  The UN member states need to embrace force to secure peace; they need to shove neutrality aside and denounce evil in order to combat  it. …."

"The UN apologizes", The Washington Post, International Herald Tribune, November 19, 1999.

                                                                       

 

 

99.        "After the humiliating failures of United Nations peacekeeping efforts in Bosnia and Rwanda there was a consensus …. that new ways of undertaking them [needed urgently to be] developed.  That is what makes the recent decision to deploy 5,500 U.N. peacekeepers to the Democratic Republic of the Congo so incomprehensible. ….

As the United Nations itself now concedes, [the efforts] in Rwanda and Bosnia … never had either the means or the mandate to accomplish anything more than a bit of marginal humanitarian relief.  [Yet in] the proposed Congo deployment …. the identical mistakes are being made once again.  The fact that they are being made with the best of intentions alters nothing … Instead, it will seem as if the world tried to do something for Africa, but nothing could be done.  Such a conclusion helps nobody, least of all those Africans who deserve so much better from the rest of the world."

David Rieff, "Making the same mistakes: Memo to the United Nations: A peacekeeping mission to Congo may do more harm than good", Newsweek, March 20, 2000.               

                                                                                                               

 

 

100.      "In recent years, the United Nations has had fundamental problems.  In 1994, the U.N.'s inability to procure goods and services fairly and on time reached a crisis.  Also there was an overall failure of its human resources system to staff critical posts with the right people.  Peacekeeping missions in Somalia, Rwanda, and Bosnia failed to accomplish their mission.

"[In 1997] The Secretary General proposed a reform program … [and] set the end of 1999 as the target to put the reforms in place. …

The United Nations … has not yet implemented reforms to focus its programming and budgeting on managing the Secretariat's performance. These initiatives would enable Member States to hold the Secretariat accountable for results and are key to the success of the overall reform … The U.N. reform is an interrelated process and requires that all core elements be in place to succeed."

US General Accounting Office, "United Nations: Reforms are progressing, but overall objectives have not been achieved", GAO/NSIAD-00-169, May 10, 2000, pp. 2-3, and

"United Nations: Reform initiatives have strengthened operations, but overall objectives have not been achieved", GAO/NSIAD-00-150, May 2000.

 


 

101.      "After the …. chaos in Sierra Leone, [many people have urged changes in UN 
peacekeeping].  But such demands assume that the UN is capable of reform.  Unfortunately, that may not be the case.

The UN is always short of the personnel it needs for peacekeeping operations.  First World countries with first-rate armies are usually unwilling to put their troops at risk.  Thus,
these operations are often left to Third World countries, and the UN sends some of the worst 
soldiers in the world off to situations where it can only hope they are not called on to do
anything.

  When peacekeepers perform badly, it is too politically embarrassing to remove them.  This is particularly true of senior officials since they were often given their jobs not because of their ability but because of the country they represent.  For instance, as the situation in Sierra 
Leone began to melt down, UN officials in New York, who usually micromanage things, began
to blame the officials in Africa for the failure."

Dennis C. Jett, "The UN's peacekeeping failures are built in and intractable", International Herald Tribune, May 23, 2000.   [Note: Mr. Jett is the author of Why peacekeeping fails, St. Martins, New York, 2000.]

 

 

 

102.      "While there is currently a comprehensive system of [UN internal] justice in place, its highly formalized nature leads to protracted and lengthy proceedings that are in the interest of neither justice nor of the staff or management.  At present, the decision makers whose administrative decisions are questioned are very rarely directly involved in defending the cases.  This has resulted in the perception that the system shields managers from being held accountable for their decisions."

"Human resources management reform: Report of the Secretary-General," UN document A/55/253 of 1 August 2000, para. 51.    [emphasis added]

 


 

103.      "The jurisdictional immunity of the [United Nations] legally obligates it to have just and effective internal processes to deal with grievances and appeals by staff, and with disciplinary cases … [as] an indispensable aid to maintaining staff morale, as well as enforcing accountability."  

"Accountability and responsibility: Report of the Secretary-General", A/55/270 of 3 August 2000, Summary, para. 39.    [emphasis added]

                                                                                   

 

 

104.      "The present report … presents the elements of an integrated and effective system of accountability.  It outlines the progress made … and outlines changes … which will allow for the effective implementation of the comprehensive system of accountability now established.