----------------------

Archive Introduction


UN Performance Problems

UN Management Accountability Struggles


Where is the Rule of Law?

Inadequate UN Oversight

Recent Developments

 
  

 

 


Overview Quotes 3                

                                                                                                    

 

Overview of IO Watch Archive Quotes III

2005-June 2006

 

 

 

148.      "[The Volcker preliminary report] … has sharply criticized the United Nations for insufficiently auditing operations [of the oil-for-food program, especially] … at its New York headquarters. …

Oil contracts were not examined [closely] … despite the fact that UN officials had contract-approval responsibilities.'

Even where audits of the programme were done, there was often no follow-up. …

The UN has explained many of the programme's problems in terms of political games between powerful countries, but the audits reveal that the UN secretariat itself failed to exert necessary oversight.

The report said more comprehensive monitoring could have deterred the surcharge scheme on Iraqi oil contracts, … as well as undercutting the Iraqi government's kickback scheme for goods purchases. …"

Mark Turner, "UN criticized by Iraq oil-for-food inquiry", Financial Times (UK), January 11, 2005.

                                                                       

 

 

149.      "The resignation of Ruud Lubbers … over allegations of sexually inappropriate behaviour brought sighs of relief yesterday from UN officials in New York.

After allegations surfaced last year, Mr. Lubbers mounted a vigorous defence.

Mr. Annan chose to issue a stern warning but take no further action.  Since then, the UN has struggled to convince an increasingly skeptical audience that it is serious about addressing mismanagement. …

{It is clear that] … something of a revolution is also needed.

For a start, [UN senior officials] believe that the UN can no longer hand out 'jobs for the boys'  behind closed doors. …

… According to [an adviser to Mr. Annan], the UN faces 'a real crisis … an architectural crisis.'  The next seven months will determine whether the edifice can be refurbished or comes crashing down."

Mark Turner, "UN reformists see opportunity for change as Lubbers leaves", Financial Times (UK), February 22, 2005.

                                                                                               

 

 

150.      " … There is a culture of secrecy that characterizes not only the World Bank, but most of the vital international organizations -- including the United Nations.  Unless these public entities establish independent oversight, external auditing of managerial and financial controls and safe channels for reporting wrongdoing, scandalous harm will continue to weaken them and only compound the grief suffered by the billions of needy people they are mandated to serve."

Melanie Beth Oliviero, "More transparency", International Herald Tribune, February 26-27, 2005.    [Note: Ms. Oliviero is International Program Director of the Government Accountability Project, at www.whistleblower.org.]


 

 

151.      " … The issues raised in the … [Secretary-General's October 2004 report on internal justice] had been raised by the [ACABQ] as far back as 1985. … The problems alluded to had persisted over many years … The Committee takes this matter very seriously as it has a significant impact on staff morale and productivity as well as … [organizational efficiency] and could also have a significant financial impact. …

The Committee regrets that the [report  was late and unresponsive] …

The Committee has consistently maintained over the years that the problems besetting the administration of justice … involve much more than a perceived lack of resources; indeed, at the core of the matter lie difficulties with administrative processes and procedures and the culture of staff-management relations.  The Committee is once again prepared to look into this matter comprehensively. …

[It trusts that} … information will also be made available on how … [the General Assembly's 2003 request to link] the administration of justice and personal responsibility and accountability [is] being met."

"Administration of justice in the Secretariat: Interim report of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions", UN document A/59/715 of 28 February 2005, paras. 3-4, 8, 10. [emphasis added]

                                                                                               

 

 

152.      "The United Nations … has its own ways of dealing with whistle-blowers.  Mostly, it fires them. … And although a supervisor's retaliation for whistle-blowing is officially prohibited under U.N. rules, enforcement comes only in the form of penalties against the offending supervisor [Note: if at all] -- not job reinstatement for the whistle-blower. …

Recent whistle-blowers interviewed by the National Journal suffered [the loss of their jobs.] …

Would-be U.N. whistle-blowers are on perilous ground, as they have no legal right to defend themselves.  'All they can do is complain and say the bully should be punished' said Tom Devine, legal director of the Government Accountability Project … The United Nations, Devine says, provides staff with fewer rights to defend themselves than 'any other government agency I've encountered, either on the national or the international level."

Corine Hegland, "Whistle-blowing at the United Nations", National Journal (US), March 12, 2005.   

                                                           

 

 

153.      "I recall the day in 1960 when the UN took charge of the Congo … [crisis because 'world opinion' deemed it] … the only body with 'clean hands.' 

Ideally the UN, foreshadowing a future world government, ought to be run by a global meritocracy -- rule by the best.  In practice, it is the opposite. Any state that can be legally defined as one can join the UN -- it is a club having no rules of probity or morals.

… The result is failure and graft.  UN officials are not answerable to bodies like Congress or the U.K.'s Parliament, which would be sure to track down, expose and punish gross abuses and manifest failures.  No senior UN official has ever gone to jail.  It's rare for anyone to be sacked or removed.  The top brass resist any kind of investigation, on principle.  The oil-for-food inquiry is unique in that it has taken place at all and seems to be garnering results.

But will any punishment be meted out?  Will any serious reforms be pushed through?  Of course not."

Paul Johnson, "The UN is for talk, not actions," Forbes (US), March 14, 2005.

[Note: Mr. Johnson is an eminent British historian and author.]

 

 

 

154.      "The United Nations Human Rights Commission, the UN's principal forum for promoting human rights, opens its annual six-week session today amid unprecedented criticism of its competence and credibility.

For years human rights groups have complained of growing politicisation and double standards that have stifled debate and allowed countries responsible for egregious abuses to escape condemnation. …

… The authoritative high-level panel on UN reform … last December said the reputation of the UN itself was threatened by the commission's 'legitimacy deficit' and 'eroding credibility and professionalism.'

[One expert] … reckons that about half the 53 members are there 'not to promote human rights but to undermine them.'  …

If there is general agreement that the commission is broken, there is less accord on how to fix it. …

… [The expert] … and others argue that countries with the worst human rights records should not be allowed to serve on the commission."

Frances Williams, "Double standards on human rights 'undermining UN'", Financial Times (UK), March 14, 2005.

                                                                                                   

 

 

155.      "The United Nations controversial peacekeeping operation in eastern Congo has received a further blow …

[An internal report,] … obtained by the Financial Times, charged that UN troops had not been tough enough in defending against renegade Congolese Army commanders … [which] threatened the shaky peace process …

Among its criticisms, the report cited poor leadership, misleading statements by the mission and the failure of a commander to follow orders …

The failure of the mission to use force during the crisis 'smeared the mission with the taint of impotence and cowardice', said the internally-commissioned report, and gave the perception 'that it had again failed the Congolese people at a critical moment.'

Monuc is the UN's most expensive peacekeeping operation, yet it has been widely criticized for incompetence, for failing to protect civilians, and becoming mired in sex scandals."

Andrew England, "UN report accuses peacekeepers of failing the Congolese people", Financial Times (UK), March 23, 2005.

                                                                       

 

 

156.      "A U.N. report on peacekeeper sex abuse released Thursday describes the U.N. military arm as deeply flawed and recommends withholding salaries of the guilty and requiring nations to pursue legal action against perpetrators.

 [The report] said abuses had been reported in missions ranging from Bosnia and Kosovo to Cambodia, East Timor, West Africa and Congo.  While allegations of abuse have dogged peacekeeping missions since their inception 50 years ago, the issue was thrust into the spotlight after the United Nations found [renewed problems in the Congo] earlier this year. …

 [The Jordanian ambassador and author of the report] … set 2007 as a target date to complete many of his recommendations …

"Parliaments, and especially those legislatures of the largest contributors to the U.N. peacekeeping budget, may feel ill at ease over continuing to extend support to peacekeeping in the absence of any significant change,' [he] said."

"U.N. report: Peacekeeping ops troubled," Associated Press, March 24, 2005.

                                                                                   

 

 

157.      " … When I worked in Liberia in the mid-Nineties a new [UN] chief administrative officer [replaced the previous CAO, who was taking kickbacks on UN procurement contracts.]  … The new CAO [moved aggressively for] … a 15 percent kickback on everything we purchased.

[He also tried to force many] … young 'local staff' to sleep with him … I was the human rights lawyer and these girls would come to my office in tears … [I wrote many memos. but] …. when I visited the UN [personnel] office in New York, they laughed at my naοve outrage: 'It happens all the time in the field', they said.  'There is nothing we can do.' …

That CAO had been knocking around West Africa for years, always mired in corruption, never disciplined, always promoted and reassigned … - during which time the head of personnel was Kofi Annan.  [The CAO] … was eventually indicted by US federal prosecutors in New York for $1.5 million of fraudulent kickbacks … He has since died.]

What kind of leadership would tolerate this conduct 10 years ago?  … Precisely the same leadership that [has now] … permitted the oil-for-food scandal and the sex-for-food scandal."          

Kenneth Cain, "How many more must die before Kofi quits?", The Observer (UK), April 2, 2005.

                                                                       

 

 

158.      "Dileep Nair [the head of the OIOS]… will be leaving the United Nations, on April 23, ostensibly disgraced.

[An interim Volcker report accused him] … of misusing Oil-for-Food funds and violating UN staff regulations. …

UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, whose own conduct was found to be 'inadequate', issued a charge letter against Nair … Annan said he's 'relieved' he's been 'exonerated' by the ongoing Volcker investigation. …

 [Further, according to … the interim Volcker report, UN Deputy Secretary-General Louise Frιchette] intervened directly … to stop United Nations auditors from forwarding their investigations to the UN Security Council.  … Frechette does not dispute she may have intervened because audits are 'a management tool to be used only by internal managers.'"   

Marinka Peschmann, "The hell no I-won't-go Secretary-General, the accused UN auditor and Louise", Canada Free Press,  4 April, 2005.

                                                                                   

 

 

159.            "Anyone who was shocked by the most recent revelations of sexual misconduct by [UN staff has never been] … in a U.N.-sponsored refugee camp.  … The [UN] and its staff lack accountability. …                               

I arrived in Sierra Leone as a legal aid worker in … 2003, … one year after … Kofi Annan issue[d] a … 'zero-tolerance' policy … [But] I found abuse of a sexual nature almost every day …

In fact, … injustices of one kind or another were perpetrated by U.N. missions or their affiliated … [NGOs] every day in the camps I visited.  Corruption was the norm, in particular the embezzlement of food and funds by NGO officials, which often left camp resources dangerously inadequate. …

… In West Africa, most of the sexual misconduct accusations are leveled against local NGO staff members. 

If the UN … is to enjoy … immunity, it … [must] police itself aggressively and thoroughly. Yet … the message is: Cover your tracks and the United Nations will obstruct your prosecution.

After [a] 2002 report documented sexual abuse, Annan's steely resolve led to exactly zero criminal prosecutions of U.N. officials for sexual abuse.  The United Nations … needs a housecleaning."

Peter Dennis, "The UN: Preying on the weak", washingtonpost.com, April 12, 2005.

                                                          
 
                       

 

160.      "The General Assembly …

"Stressing that the system of justice in the United Nations as a whole should be independent, transparent, effective, efficient and fair,

Stressing the importance of increased transparency in decision-making and increased accountability of managers for the system,

Regretting that the present system of administration of justice in the Secretariat continues to be slow, cumbersome, and costly,

14.  Notes that staff rule 112.3, which relates to the financial liability of managers, has yet to be implemented …"

"47. Decides that the Secretary-General shall form a panel of external and independent experts to consider redesigning the system of administration of justice;

[49.(a) … [and]            propose a new model for resolving staff grievances … that is independent, transparent, effective, efficient and adequately resourced and that ensures managerial accountability; …

[49c.] … while acknowledging the uniqueness of the United Nations system, in particular the immunity of United Nations staff from national laws and thus the lack of recourse to national courts; …"

"Administration of justice at the United Nations", General Assembly resolution 59/283 of 13 April 2005, preambular and Part I, paras. 11-12, 14, and Part IV. [emphasis added]


 

 

161.      "The Advisory Committee is concerned about the unevenness in the quality of presentation in the [Secretary-General's reports on financing peacekeeping.]  While [it] recognizes the difficulties inherent in assembling [field] information … the ultimate responsibility rests with Headquarters for maintaining standards with regard to presentation, timeliness of submission, accuracy of figures and consistency in the definition and application of policies.

The Advisory Committee notes with concern a tendency … [by the Administration acting through peacekeeping budgets] to introduce initiatives with policy implications, rather than first seeking necessary guidance from the General Assembly. … 

Notable current examples of this [are] … discussed at greater length below …

The Committee strongly cautions against what appears to be a less than transparent means for changing policy …"

"Report of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions", UN document A/59/736 of 22 April 2005, paras. 31-32 and ff.                [emphasis added]

                                               

 

 

162.            "'Unprecedented challenges' faced by the UN have shown that the world body must immediately reform' …

[according to] background information distributed prior to a press briefing by [the UN Deputy Secretary-General.] ……

'The UN must take real action now … particularly in the critical areas of management, oversight and accountability' …

'Perhaps the most obvious shortcomings identified by the Volcker Inquiry and other crises are in the area of oversight and accountability. The current 'control' systems for monitoring management performance and preventing fraud and corruption are insufficient and must be significantly enhanced,' she said."

"Frιchette unveils UN reforms responding to Volcker panel's criticisms", UN News Service,17 May 2005.                [emphasis added]                                                                                                                                                               

 

 

163.      "The Famine Early Warning Systems Network … monitors the threat of mass hunger in some of the poorest parts of the world.  FEWS Net has published an inquiry into the world's failure to respond to food shortages in Niger and the rest of the Sahel.  The report is entitled simply: 'What went wrong?"  That is the right question to ask.  But what is surprising, and disconcerting, is that the report was written in 1997, not 2005.  This illustrates two things: Niger's present nightmare is a recurring one; and whatever went wrong in 1997 was not put right by 2005." 

"Famine relief: Starving for the cameras", The Economist, August 20th, 2005, pp. 10-11.

 

 

164.            "Vladimir Kuznetsov, a Russian diplomat in charge of a powerful UN budgetary oversight committee [the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions (ACABQ)] was arrested by US authorities Thursday morning on money laundering charges.

The arrest deals yet another blow to the UN ahead of this month's summit of world leaders.  It is already braced for sharp criticism in next week's [Volcker] report … into corruption in the oil for food programme.

The [ACABQ] recommends to the General Assembly how the UN should spend its money.

Mr. Kuznetsov is accused of conspiring with an unnamed procurement officer to facilitate the secret payment of bribes from foreign companies seeking UN contracts."       

Mark Turner, "UN diplomat on laundering charge", Financial Times (UK), September 4, 2005.  [emphasis added]  [Note: See, in Google search, "Vladimir Kuznetsov ACABQ" .]

                                                           

           

 

165.      "The main conclusions are unambiguous.

The [United Nations] requires stronger executive leadership, thoroughgoing administrative reform, and more reliable controls and auditing. …

There was corruption within the United Nations at a critical management point.  There was exposure of important administrative and control weaknesses … The consequences? An avoidable loss of assistance to Iraq's population and a grievous loss of credibility to the United Nations. …

The Committee believes: first, 'professional disciplines' at the United Nations are weak and eroded …; second, there appears to be a pervasive culture of responsibility avoidance and resistance to accountability; third, there was … an absence of suitable administrative infrastructure; and fourth, there was an absence of adequate and independent control and auditing capacity."

Independent Inquiry Committee into the United Nations Oil-for-Food Programme (the "Volcker panel"), "The Management of the United Nations Oil-for-Food Programme", September 7, 2005, Volume I, pages 1, 9, 13. [emphasis added]    [Note: This and the two following reports are available in full at  http://www.iic-offp.org/ .]

 

 

166.      "Based on the evidence set forth in Chapters 1 through 5 of Volume III … the Committee finds as follows:

As the Chief Administrative Officer of the United Nations, the Secretary-General carried oversight and management responsibilities for the entire Secretariat.  That particularly included auditing and controls functions that had demonstrable problems …

… The record amply demonstrates a number of instances where there was a lack of support for and oversight of the Programme by the Secretary-General.  Some of the problems identified by the Committee are: (1) [an unclear and inappropriately monitored] … delegation to Deputy Secretary-General [Louise] Frιchette;  (2) an inadequate response to and investigation of reports of Iraqi abuses and corruption of the Programme, above all by failing to ensure that reports of Programme violations were brought to the attention of … the Security Council; (3) a lack of adequately ensuring that the sanctions objective of the Programme received appropriate attention; and (4) a failure to provide adequate oversight of the Executive Director of the Programme, Mr. [Benon] Sevan.

In sum, in light of these circumstances, the cumulative management performance of the Secretary-General fell short of the standards that the [UN] should strive to maintain."

Independent Inquiry Committee into the United Nations Oil-for-Food Programme (the "Volcker inquiry"), "The Management of the United Nations Oil-for-Food Programme", September 7, 2005, Volume III, p. 185. [emphasis added]

 

 

167.            "[Assessment of programme oversight]

OIOS did not have an adequate budget to properly investigate the [Oil-for-Food Programme]. …

The Committee notes that on at least three occasions OIOS [Investigations Division] referred complaints back to … the relevant departments to conduct their own internal inquiries.  … According to OIOS ID, complaints were regularly referred back to the entity submitting the complaint due to the limited financial resources. …

The Committee finds several deviations from 'best practices.'

[They] … included: (a) lack of direct reporting to an independent oversight board; (b) failure to perform risk assessments to professional … standards; and (c) lack of budgetary independence. …

OIOS ID is generally not supported and accepted across the United Nations by both management and staff.  This, together with a lack of a whistleblower protection policy, prevents OIOS ID from successfully carrying out its mandate."

Independent Inquiry Committee into the United Nations Oil-for-Food Programme (the "Volcker inquiry"), "The Management of the United Nations Oil-for-Food Programme", September 7, 2005, Volume IV, pp.71, 73, 77. [emphasis added]

 

 

168.            "Tomorrow's summit of world leaders teetered on the brink of fiasco … as substantive reforms promoting human rights and overhauling the UN's top management risked being killed off by a group of developing countries fearful of western intervention. …

Diplomats said … Russia, China and some … developing countries had emasculated calls for a smaller, more effective human rights council …

Meanwhile, India was objecting to the establishment of a new international legal principle, the 'responsibility to protect' … and tougher language on tackling terrorism was bogged down as some countries insisted [on a balancing statement] asserting the right of oppressed peoples to self-determination, a formulation that some saw as a get-out clause. …

Hopes the summit would agree to expand the Security Council died this summer when would-be new members failed to agree a common position on such reform."

Mark Turner, "UN summit faces fiasco amid threat to reforms", Financial Times (UK), September 13, 2005.

                                     

 

169.      "This week, on the 60th anniversary of the United Nations, world leaders met to endorse a new statement of common aims.  The main aim?   To help humanity speak with one voice.

Fixing the UN itself has been a top agenda item for years. But finding a consensus among 191 members has become vexing as more demands are made on an out-of-date system for global group action.

A move away from a single global body to shifting networks of permanent and temporary alliances may better reflect the historic globalizing forces in the 21st century.  The United Nations remains ossified in the world of 1945 and the Cold War.  It still has its uses, and another round of reform is needed.  But barring that, the alternatives to the UN are looking better and better."

"Fixing the United Nations", Boston Globe, in the International Herald Tribune, September 17-18, 2005.

                                                           

 

 

170.      "The Fifth Committee (Administrative and Budgetary) … [continued to discuss] the report of the International Civil Service Commission … and the proposed framework on new contractual arrangements within the United Nations. …

Jamaica's representative, speaking on behalf of the 'Group of 77' developing countries and China … stated that the Group was prepared to consider the proposed system of continuing, fixed-term and temporary contracts … but also emphasized the importance of job security for staff members, saying that it was vital to ensure impartiality, independence and integrity of the staff."

"UN pay and benefits review, new contract framework among issues, as budget committee debates …",  UN document GA/AB/3693 of 21 October 2005.

                                                           

 

 

171.      "As the Fifth Committee (Administrative and Budgetary) today continued its general debate on the budget proposal for 2006-2007 following its introduction by Secretary-General Kofi Annan yesterday, several speakers expressed concern over increasing extrabudgetary funding of United Nations activity …

While the budget proposal … amounts to $3.6 billion, it is expected that some $5.6 billion in extrabudgetary resources will be utilized for a variety of activities …

[also the regular budget did not include] … the cost of United Nations peacekeeping operations [nearly $8 billion from 1 July 2004 to June 30 2006, and international tribunals] …

Speakers also noted that most of the 3,019 'ineffective, obsolete and marginally useful' outputs proposed for termination during the biennium were related to development activities.

China's representative said that all resource appropriations must be accompanied by reasonable justification. The Organization should match resources with actual requirements, rein in resource growth, improve management and use resources effectively."

"Concern expressed over increasing extrabudgetary funding of UN activities …", UN document GA/AB/ 3698 of 26 October 2005, pp. 1-2.    [emphasis added]

                                                           

 

 

172.      "[A report by Deloitte Consulting LLP, a global accounting and consulting firm, found that] unless addressed soon, serious oversight and safeguard deficiencies leave the United Nations procurement system open to fraud …

The report found … 'a significant reliance on people [which] leaves the UN extremely vulnerable to potential fraudulent or corrupt activity, and limits the Organization's means to either prevent or detect such actions.'

The assessment also found weaknesses in ethics and integrity training, which were not supported by management, along with a 'lack of urgency in response to adverse audit findings, and unclear lines of authority and accountability.'

The report recommends remedies for each of the adverse conditions …"

"Report on UN procurement calls for better safeguard and oversight systems", UN News Service, 6 December 2005.  [emphasis added]   [Note: Available, at Google Search, under "Deloitte Consulting   UN procurement" .]


 

 

173.            "[Secretary-General Kofi Annan at his year-end press conference said] … The year about to end has been a really difficult one -- from the tsunami to events in Lebanon and Darfur and beyond. …  Let us look forward to what we can and must do next year. …

I hope [Member States] …. will agree on a package of management reforms that I shall put before them in February. …

If there's one thing I would like to hand over to my successor when I leave office next year, it is that it should be a UN that is fit for the many varied tasks and challenges that we are asked to take on today."

'Transcript of press conference by [the Secretary-General", UN document SG/SM/10280 of 21 December  2005.

                                                           

 

 

174.      "[A year after the South Asian tsunami disaster ] … pledges of transparency and accountability for the UN's [$1.1 billion 'flash appeal'] … appear a long way from being realised.  This is primarily blamed on dueling UN bureaucracies and accounting methods plus what in many cases appears to be institutional paranoia about disclosure …   

… [Broad totals exist, but] … what is harder to determine is how that money has actually been spent, according to a two-month investigation by the Financial Times. …

The only way to [get details on some $100 million projects] is to approach each of the 39 agencies listed in the appeal, UN officials say. …

[An NGO financing expert says, for instance] that no international standards exist for … reasonable overhead costs.  And what is disclosed by aid agencies is often 'meaningless.' …

After a year spent pledging transparency, it appears the disaster relief world has a long way to go before it catches up with the private sector."

Shawn Donnan, "Little clarity on how aid gets spent", Financial Times (UK), December 23, 2005.      [emphasis added]

                                                                       

 

 

175.      "Tasked by world leaders at the largest summit in United Nations history with giving new momentum to global development goals and strengthening the 60-year-old body, the General Assembly wrapped up its 2005 substantive session agreeing on two landmark decisions: to establish a new Peacebuilding Commission … and to launch a new standby relief fund that will provide instant cash in the wake of natural disasters. …

Those decisions … cap what Secretary-General Kofi Annan has described as a 'difficult year' for the United Nations …

Left pending, however, were the more nettlesome Summit proposals, with decisions on the creation of an upgraded Human Rights Council, completion of negotiations on an anti-terrorism convention and a plan to increase oversight of United Nations activities, all delayed, so far, until next year.  The Assembly also pledged to continue the search for … [an expanded] Security Council …"

" … 60th General Assembly takes first steps toward major UN reform …", UN document GA/10444 of 27 December 2005.

                                                                       

 

176.      "On the first anniversary of the … [South Asian tsunami, the media emphasized that] … we are powerless in the face of natural disasters. …

[However,] governments and international organizations should start paying serious attention to … disaster preparedness. …

Disaster prevention programs might seem to be luxuries for impoverished countries.  But … according to the Tearfund, a British development group, … every dollar spent on prevention … [can save] a further $4 to $10 on relief and reconstruction.

Developing countries are by far the hardest hit … Of more than two million people killed in natural disasters in the last 20 years, 98 percent were from poor countries. …

[An Earth Institute expert recently wrote that] … "With natural hazard cycles repeating themselves every few years, developing countries find themselves in a vicious cycle of loss and recovery … The international community [should] manage disaster risk as an integral part of development planning rather than only as a humanitarian issue.

What are we waiting for?"

Anders Wijkman, "We can minimize natural disasters", International Herald Tribune, December 31, 2005-January 1, 2006. 

 

 

 

177.      "The United Nations is conducting some 200 investigations into its procurement activities and has placed eight officials on special leave …

[The UN's top manager] said a just-completed report of the UN's internal watchdog [the OIOS] raised 'a number of serious allegations and concerns' about UN procurement. …

He outlined steps the Organization has taken to improve its procurement practices, including providing more resources to OIOS so that it can undertake a wider investigation of the UN's spending on supplies and services. …

He repeatedly thanked 'the courageous men and women of the United Nations who have continued to come forward to report fraud.'

 … 'We are ferreting out corruption and fraud where it existed and where it exists,' he stated. …

[Audit excerpts] described systemic failures  'The design and maintenance of controls …  were insufficient' … 'Important controls were lacking while existing ones were often bypassed.'"

"UN announces over 200 procurement investigations and puts 8 staff on leave", UN Secretariat News Service, 23 January 2006.    [emphasis added]

                                                           

 

           

178.      "In a sense, the alleged irregularities in peacekeeping procurement [recently reported], involving possible waste and fraud of up to $300 [million], do more damage to the UN's reputation than the larger abuse of the UN oil-for-food programme for Iraq. … The UN Secretariat could rightly put some of the blame on the Security Council [in oil-for-food] …The secretariat has no such plausible scapegoat in its mismanagement of peacekeeping procurement."

"UNcovering waste: The world's peacekeeping requires better bookkeeping", Financial Times (UK), January 26, 2006.   [emphasis added]   [Note: Many other articles are emerging on this topic, see under Google Search, "UN procurement scandal".]

                                               

 

 

179.            "Governments are violating the human rights of their own citizens as tsunami survivors endure discrimination, inadequate housing and assaults one year after the tragedy swept through Southeast Asia, [says] a study released today …

The 64-page report, titled "Tsunami Response: A Human Rights Assessment" … was prepared by three [NGO's] …

The report found that governments in some areas have created so-called buffer zones to stop people [who relied on the sea for their livelihood] from rebuilding along the coast on the pretext of safety, even as commercial groups, such as a tourist resort in … India, were given access to the land …

Among its 10 recommendations, the report calls for the UN system to play a larger role in monitoring human rights compliance and for the international community, including global institutions providing financing to the devastated areas, to integrate human rights into their humanitarian donor policies."

"Study showing governments violate human rights of tsunami survivors released at UN", UN News Service, 1 February 2006.

                                                           

 

 

180.      "The head of AWB, the Australian wheat exporter at the centre of the Iraqi bribes probe, resigned yesterday in the fact of allegations that the company paid A$ 300 [million] in kickbacks to the former regime of Saddam Hussein.

Andrew Lindberg had quit 'in the best interests of the company' …

[His] exit had been predicted since he appeared before the Cole Commission of Inquiry last month. …

'We expected a purge of AWB management; this is the first step to rebuilding investor confidence' … said an analyst.  "We don't think he will be the last.'

[A bank adviser said] 'You can't have a managing director that's been called to fault by a million people without sacking him, or his resigning.' …

The publicly listed monopoly could face a legal challenge from its shareholders … [including] a shareholder class action suit … [claiming] that AWB breached its requirement of continuous disclosure."

Leora Moldovsky, "Head of AWB resigns in Iraq kickbacks scandal", Financial Times (UK), February 10, 2006.    [Note: Similar resignations, and civil and criminal court cases, are underway against senior officials in several major UN Member States.  Meanwhile, the UN has moved quietly but swiftly away from its own oil-for-food accountability issues, only to stumble into the major, emerging UN procurement scandal.]

 

 

 

181.             "Choosing a new secretary general may be the most telling action the United Nations takes in 2006, but  … [the selection procedure is very awkward] …

This year was long previewed as Asia's turn to fill the post … [but there are many other candidates.] …

Kofi Annan's second five-year term ends on Dec. 31, and there is particular interest in the contest to succeed him because scandals in the oil-for-food program and the UN purchasing office have prompted calls for an executive with proven management skills in addition to the usual diplomatic talents.

But there are no established qualifications for the post, no search committees, no interviews, no background checks, no campaign rules and no forums for showcasing aspirants and their ideas. …

'At the UN' … [an academic expert said], 'the winner turns out to be the least objectionable person to the most number of countries, and particularly to the permanent five [members of the U N Security Council.]'"

Warren Hoge, "Transition time at UN" Leadership after Annan", International Herald Tribune, February 13, 2006.                [Note: It is often forgotten (or glossed over) that Kofi Annan at least had a Master's of Science degree in Management from the prestigious Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).  It is highly likely that his successor will have no serious management credentials or accomplishments at all.]               


 

 

182.      " … According to the editor of a review of global peacekeeping by .. [the] Centre on International Cooperation, without more support for the UN, a new mission in Darfur could take its peacekeeping efforts 'past the point of overstretch.' …

According to the CIC, the number of troops deployed by the UN worldwide has nearly quintupled since 1999, from 12,700 to over 60,000 (with civilians and police, the number is over 85,000.) ... Yet, as the UN struggles, numbers of peacekeepers deployed by organizations such as NATO, the European Union and the African Union … [have fallen since 1999] from 108,000 to 50,000. …

 {Also,] managing increasingly large and often hybrid operations involving other partners is increasingly tricky [for the UN.] …

As the strain tells, the flaws get wrenchingly apparent.  … Last week the UN Security Council took a hard look at both waste and fraud in peacekeeping procurement and also at reports of sexual abuse by peacekeepers … UN officials blame such problems on a 'culture of dismissiveness' among their own staff, in countries providing troops and in the missions themselves. …"

"United Nations peacekeeping: Quality strained: Too few forces, too little oversight", The Economist, March 4th, 2006, p. 40.    [emphasis added]

 

 

 

183.      "The United Nations Security Council will today face a challenge to its monopoly on choosing a successor to Kofi Annan, the outgoing secretary-general. …

Canada has spearheaded calls for a fairer process, saying recently: 'The lack of transparency and inclusiveness of the exercise has become increasingly noticeable, and the UN process compares poorly with the practices of other international organizations.' …

New ideas include a process of hearings, briefings by candidates, … [and] for the General Assembly to be given more than one candidate to choose from …

In recent weeks the Security Council has started to brief the General Assembly president on its deliberations, hoping to stave off calls for more radical reform. …

Privately, many diplomats fear it is already too late to introduce any real change this time round, and that genuine reform will need to wait until 2011.

Many also expect that … [this year's decision] will be dominated by the US and China, particularly since the post is expected to go to an Asian."

Mark Turner, "Security Council challenged on Annan successor", Financial Times (UK), April 19, 2006.

 

  

 

184.      "The United Nations confirmed yesterday the U.S. Attorney's Office [for the Southern District of New York] is investigating suspected wrongdoing in … procurement for U.N. peacekeeping operations.

In a further blow … a [new] report by the [US] Government Accountability Office … describes the procurement office [that spent about $1.6 billion last year] as understaffed, poorly trained and badly lacking the oversight that would uncover corruption, fraud and waste.

Eight senior staff members were suspended with pay earlier this year … [They] likely have diplomatic immunity, but [the UN's top manager] said Secretary-General Kofi Annan would lift that protection if authorities request it. …

'U.N. resources are unnecessarily vulnerable to mismanagement, waste, fraud and abuse' the GAO report says, 'because the procurement process is improperly managed …[and]  has not committed to maintaining a professional, trained work force …'

An audit by Deloitte Consulting late last year also revealed shortcomings in peacekeeping procurement … [some reaching] as far back as 1992, when Mr. Annan ran the peacekeeping department."

Betsy Pisik, "U.S. probe targets U.N. department", The Washington Times, April 27, 2006.    [emphasis added]     [Note: The GAO testimony and three reports on UN procurement, oversight, control, and independence problems can be found at www.gao.gov/new.items/d06701t.pdf and d06577.pdf , d06330.pdf, and d06575.pdf.] 

 


 

185.      "The United Nations was bracing itself [yesterday] for a potentially major budget crisis, after the developing world rejected entreaties by rich countries and the UN secretariat, and was expected to press ahead with a resolution many fear could sink efforts to reform the organization.

A highly charged meeting of the UN's budget committee descended on Thursday evening into angry rhetoric after South Africa, representing the G77 group of developing nations and China, threw back a last-ditch effort by UN secretary-general Kofi Annan to defuse the situation.

At the heart of the showdown lay a power struggle for control of the UN, between developing nations, which constitute the majority of its membership, the developed world, which pays most of the UN's bills, and the UN Secretariat, which wants more autonomy."

Mark Turner, "UN faces budget crisis as nations argue over reform", The Financial Times (UK), April 28, 2006.    [emphasis added]

                                                                                                   

 

 

186.      "No longer dominated by a few formal intergovernmental institutions, the multilateral system (if that is what the shifting constellation of alternative arrangements can be called) is in a state of perpetual flux. … It is increasingly challenged by innovative governance arrangements, driven by competing interests and demands from actors traditionally outside of or marginalized within the established interstate institutions.

While alternative intergovernmental arrangements tend to complement rather than undermine formal multilateral institutions, continuing to resort to them could further sideline the UN on the most important issues of the day. …

How to encourage more effective decisionmaking and operational mechanisms that satisfy input (and output) legitimacy criteria is the central question of global governance, one that is being put to the test in the broad range of innovative arrangements that now characterize the multilateral system. …

While formal and informal intergovernmental arrangements and multistakeholder initiatives will continue to evolve and adapt to changing international realities, a more deliberate effort will need to be made to find the right balance between them …"

Shepard Forman and Derk Segaar, "New coalitions for global governance: The changing dynamics of multilateralism", Global Governance 12 (2), April-June 2006, pp. 205-225 [221-222.]     [Note: The article provides an up-to-date catalog of the many alternative arrangements for global decisionmaking, with particular attention to issues of legitimacy, accountability, and sustainability.]

                                                           

 

 

187.      "A UN-appointed investigator has completed his probe into allegations that the one-time head of the [UN's Office of Internal Oversight Services, Dileep Nair ] … showed favoritism in recruiting and promoting employees, officials said.  …

The report had been delivered to UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan last week. … The contents of the report are secret [and] … were not immediately released. … 

An initial investigation cleared [Nair], but Annan ordered a new probe after an outside review … found there was enough evidence to proceed.

Nair denies any wrongdoing.

The charges caused particular controversy at the UN because the [OIOS] … is responsible for upholding … [its] integrity.

[The UN oil-for-food investigatory committee, led by Paul Volcker also] said Nair paid an employee with money from the USD 64-billion programme although the staffer's work was not directly involved in the plan."

"Probe into former chief of UN internal watchdog complete", zeenews.com, May 2, 2006.

 

 

 

188.            "Despairing of a [malfunctioning UN 'internal justice'] system …, [UN staff member Cynthia] Brzak, who two years ago … [alleged] sexual harassment, is now … [asking] for a hearing at the U.S. Supreme Court.

'You have to be able to go somewhere and ask for justice,' said Brzak.  'I've tried as hard as I could within the system.'  …

There's plenty in this lawyer's discussion that the rest of the world might want to consider. … The pleadings highlight the fundamental problem that senior U.N. officials enjoy the privileges of sovereign immunity, but because the U.N. is not a sovereign state, they are spared the accountability that tends to come … [in a democratic] national government. This is accompanied by page after page of  … illuminating [detail] about the inner workings of the U.N.

Brzak alleges that U.N. officials retaliated for her whistle-blowing by inflicting an array of punishing measures … [and] includes the allegation, for example, that [Secretary-General Kofi] 'Annan ignores the investigation report [in her favor] and U. N. procedures, which is manifestly illegal.'

… The Supreme Court may not be the answer, but the rest of Washington would do well to take up this case."

Claudia Rosett, "A supreme mess: One U.N. staffer petitions our high Court", National Review Online (US), May 5, 2006.  [emphasis added]     [Note: The full text of this US Supreme Court filing is available on the home page of this website under "US Supreme Court case …".]

 

 

 

189.            "Aspiring to fix top international crises, the United Nations is unable to fix its own home. …  In a resignation statement …  , the man charged with removing asbestos from the [New York headquarters] … building and bringing it up to current safety codes, Louis Frederick Reuter, … [concluded that] the United Nations is too busy talking … to take care [of] the crumbling of its own house. …

A 'management reform' attempt, aspiring to transfer key powers from the hands of member states to the secretary general, failed spectacularly at the assembly recently. …

Deputy Secretary-General Mark Malloch Brown … also advised Mr. Annan to accept a $500,000 prize from the emir of Dubai, after telling the rest of the  staff to stop accepting any gifts worth more than $250.

Mr. Annan then named one of the men responsible for awarding the Dubai environmental prize, Achim Steiner, to head the U.N. Environmental Program.  Allegations of quid pro quo are 'unfair' to Mr. Steiner, Mr. Annan told the press late last week. …

Following such goings on, anyone claiming to care about the United Nations would be hard pressed to say leaving Mr. Annan intact was a good bet."

Benny Avni, "Tower of Babel can't be fixed", The New York Sun, May 8, 2006.   

[emphasis added]

                                               

 

 

190.      "The General Assembly this afternoon adopted resolutions recommended by its Fifth Committee (Administrative and Budgetary) on a number of major issues, including the Secretary-General's management reform proposals …

While welcoming [Mr. Annan's] commitment  to strengthening the Organization and taking note of his report Investing in the United Nations …, the Assembly reaffirmed its oversight role and that of the Fifth Committee in administrative and budgetary matters … [and] in carrying out a thorough analysis and approval of the human and financial resources and policies.

The Assembly also highlighted the importance of strengthened accountability in the Organization and of ensuring greater accountability of the Secretary-General to Member States.  It requested the Secretary-General to specifically define accountability, as well as clear accountability mechanisms, in the context of a series of reports requested in the resolution, and to propose clear parameters for its applications and instruments for its rigorous enforcement -- without exception -- at all levels."

"Acting on budget committee recommendations, General Assembly adopts text on management reform proposals by vote of 121-50-2", General Assembly document GA/10458, Dept. of Public Information, New York, 8 May 2006.    [emphasis added]    [Note: The GA resolution is A/RES/60/260 of  8 May 2006, available at www.un.org/documents, esp. preambular paras. and part I.]

 


 

191.            "Liberian girls as young as 8 are being sexually exploited by United Nations peacekeepers, aid workers and teachers in return for food, small favors and even rides in trucks, according to a report from Save the Children U.K.

The report says the problem is widespread throughout Liberia, which is struggling to get back on its feet after a long and bloody civil war.

Save the Children based its findings on interviews with more than 300 people in camps and … [neighborhoods of returnees.] …

'All of the respondents clearly stated that the scale of the problem affected over half of the girls in their locations,' the report says. …

The United Nations said that eight cases of sexual abuse and exploitation involving UN workers had been reported [in 2006] and that one staff member had been suspended, Reuters reported.

Save the Children said Liberia and the UN should set up an office to investigate cases of sexual exploitation and work to ensure that the behavior stops … [, and] that UN workers found guilty of sexual abuse should be removed by their home countries."

"Aid workers in Liberia accused of sex abuse", The New York Times in the International Herald Tribune, May 9, 2006.

 


 

192.      "The election last week of 47 members of the United Nations' new Human Rights Council cannot be considered an unqualified success.  As with the old UN Human Rights Commission, some of the foxes have won the privilege of guarding the hen house.  But there are fewer abusers of human rights on this body, and some of the worst abusers were either fearful of applying for places on the new council or were defeated when they did. …

The underlying problem for a UN body to protect human rights lies in the fact that most nation-states are extremely reluctant to criticize and condemn other governments.  The most energetic exceptions to this rule are the new democratic governments of Central Europe and Latin America, whose leaders remember only too well the plight of prisoners of conscience in dictatorships.

… The old Western democracies should join with the new democracies to make sure the council fulfills its commitments to protect citizens around the world against states that are violating their human rights."

"Culling foxes at the UN", The Boston Globe in the International Herald Tribune, May 16, 2006.   [emphasis added]

 

 

 

193.      "For those of us who admire the United Nations, there is an uncomfortable reality to deal with: the UN … has been just as ineffective [in Darfur] for the last three years as it was during the slaughter in Rwanda, Bosnia, and Cambodia. …

The World Food Program and Unicef are first-rate [running school-feeding programmes and emergency food shipments.]  Those UN field workers are heroic … [They] redeem the honor of the UN …

The UN's senior officials  [just might] learn  how to use … the bully pulpit. ... Jan Egeland, the UN's undersecretary for humanitarian affairs.  … has led the way on disasters by being undiplomatic about horrors [that occur.]

If other UN officials … [devoted] less energy to diplomatic receptions and more to dragging journalists through the world's hell-holes, the globe would be a better place. …

Take it from this disillusioned fan of the UN system: Let's also be realistic and drop any fantasy that the UN is going to save the day as a genocide unfolds.  In that mission, the United Nations is failing about as badly as the League of Nations did."

Nicholas D. Kristof, "Dithering through death", International Herald Tribune, May 17, 2006.     [emphasis added]     [Note: Mr. Kristov writes very extensively about humanitarian issues, crises, and operations worldwide.]


 

 

194.            "[Sudden] hand-to mouth existence … [in East Timor personifies] what was supposed to be the world's model new nation. …

Some of the best brains at the United Nations and World Bank [came] to set up government, … [military, police, and economic structures] and education and health programs from 1999 to 2002, when the United Nations administered East Timor. …

Seven years later, … [UN and World Bank studies acknowledge that] the people of East Timor are poorer. An economic uptick … collapsed after many of the foreign advisers left … only 30 percent [of children] make it to secondary school.  Very few … find jobs …the [very high] child mortality rate … [continues because there are few] free community-based health services. …

The country lacked … [experienced] people to fill essential jobs …, says a senior manager …  'We have ministers, but no middle managers.'

More than half the foreign assistance was spent on salaries and consultancy fees for the foreign advisers, the East Timorese government asserts.

In essence, [the manager] said, the foreigners were too impatient.  They came, spread their money around and left.  'You can't build a country from nothing in that amount of time.'"

Jane Perlez, "Ruins of nation building: Billions in aid brought East Timor little", International Herald Tribune, May 31, 2006.      [emphasis added]

 

 

195.      "The UN was created to foster a peaceful international order built upon a foundation of collective security. … [But its] habitual failure to protect the victims of murderous regimes [is] being reenacted today as senior UN officials and members of the UN Security Council acquiesce in the despotic brutality of the illegitimate military junta that rules Myanmar, formerly known as Burma.

[After a visit last month,] … Kofi Annan's top deputy, Undersecretary General Ibrahim Gambari, … reported that the junta military leader is ready 'to turn a new page.' …

But no new page was turned … [to release the imprisoned Nobel Peace Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, or 1,100 other political prisoners.] …

[The junta] … will not change without sustained international pressure on a regime that has been condemned for its use of forced labor, the flight of hundreds of thousands of refugees and the export to neighboring countries of [drugs and AIDS.] …

Inexplicably, … [A Security Council member] said Wednesday, 'we would not be happy' to [go beyond hearing] Gambari's briefings on his failed mission.  This is an attitude that betrays not only the Burmese people but also the UN's founding ideals."

"Myanmar's unturned page", The Boston Globe in the International Herald Tribune, June 6, 2006.

 

 

 

196.      "[Kofi] Annan came into office as a reform advocate with an insider's eye.  [But] many at the United Nations now believe that new blood is essential if the organization is ever to make the revolutionary changes necessary for the body to be effective.

[UN senior officials] all were appointed by Mr. Annan, some as late as a few months ago. [Their annual salaries and allowances currently include: Mr. Annan and his deputy, Mark Malloch Brown ($300,000 and $287,000); 15 under-secretary generals and 17 assistant-secretary generals in New York ($177,000 and $161,000); other senior officials in UN posts around the world, and Mr. Annan's more than 90 'special envoys'.] …

UN rules call for the deputy and [all USG's to leave office when] the U.N. chief leaves …

[But ASG's] … are not required to leave.  In many cases, … [they] carry the institutional memory …

The United Nations staff union … recently resisted reform measures pushed by Mr. Annan's top management … [as] 'bottom heavy' with [deep lower-level staff cuts] while leaving many at the top of the bureaucracy intact.  … Union officials said they would support mass resignation of senior employees … [to] 'give free hand for the new secretary-general.'"

Benny Avni, "U.S. wants top aides at the U.N. to resign when Annan leaves," New York Sun, June 7, 2006. 

                                               

 

 

197.      "The OECD's annual African Economic Outlook finds that … 'limited progress' has been made toward the UN Millennium Development Goals.  In spite of new poverty reduction strategies in many countries,  it finds that on current trends most of the continent will fail to meet the target of halving poverty rates by 2015, that 'negligible progress' has been made in combating hunger, and that barely a quarter of African countries are likely to fulfil the goal of universal primary schooling. 

South of the Sahara, it finds no evidence of declining death rates in pregnancy and childbirth, … serious gender gaps in education, and low levels of economic and political participation by women."

"OECD report: Africa grows but development goals are unmet", The Financial Times (UK), May 16, 2006.

 

197a.    "The Ford Foundation on Tuesday announced an independent, African-led nonprofit that aims to give Africans greater opportunity to solve the continent's problems themselves.  The Ford Foundation committed $30 million to fund TrustAfrica, which has been developed over the past five years and will now be based in Senegal's capital, Dakar."

                                    "Briefing", the International Herald Tribune, June 7, 2006.

                                                                                                                               

197b.            "Archbishop Desmond Tutu, the Nobel peace prize winner who played a key role in ending apartheid in South Africa, has questioned assumptions laid out in the United Nations' Millennium Development Goals as well as the approach of big western donors in Africa. …

He stressed the continent needed 'those huge injections of funds', … [but] noted that many large donors [including the UN with its Millennium Development Goals] lacked the on-the-ground knowledge to make their funds effective in the communities that received them.

'They must find out what the people want and not just always the people who attend conferences or are in the government,' he said. …

He added, 'I'm of the view that, like in politics, all development is local.  You can have the grand view, but if you don't infuse people at a grass-roots level you're playing marbles.'"

Paul Sullivan, "Donors to Africa urged to 'think local'", The Financial Times (UK), June 8, 2006.

 

197c.    "The one-third of world development aid that is spent on rich country consultants does little to reduce poverty, a senior World Bank economist said yesterday. Mark Sundberg, author of a recent report on the effectiveness of aid given to meet the world's Millennium Development Goals … says so-called 'technical assistance' is not aligned with those goals.

'It is a question of priorities.  Five hundred days of technical assistance costs the same as employing 5,000 teachers.  Which does more to cut poverty?'

'It is not all bad … but we need to measure its effectiveness', [he] said at the Brussels launch of the bank's Global Monitoring Report, tracking progress made by developing countries in using aid well."

Andrew Bounds, "World Bank casts doubt on consultants' effectiveness", Financial Times (UK), June 8, 2006.

                                                                                               

 

 

198.      "On Tuesday,  …[Kofi Annan's deputy, Mr. Mark] Malloch Brown, told a Manhattan audience, "The U.N.'s role is in effect a secret in Middle America",  … He then accused the US 'of being the only government not fully supporting' [UN headquarters' renovation, not surprising since the US must provide the huge loan for it], … [and] opposing the new Human Rights Council. …

To cap it off, he interjected himself into the U.S. political debate: 'Who will campaign in 2008 for a new multilateral national security?' …

We weren't previously aware that it's considered appropriate for international civil servants to speak this way about a U.N. member state that pays nearly a quarter of his $287,000 tax free salary … [but] we were a little surprised by the absence of any reference in the speech to  [the very recent UN oil-for-food, peacekeeper sexual abuse, bribery, and major procurement scandals.] …

U.S. Ambassador John Bolton described Mr. Malloch Brown's speech as [a grave mistake], adding that … 'the victim, I fear, will be the United Nations.'  He's right.  If Mr. Maloch Brown's speech serves any purpose, it is to remind American taxpayers of everything they don't like about the U.N." 

                        "Toqueville at Turtle Bay", The Wall Street Journal, June 12, 2006.

                                                                                   

 

 

199.      "You [the Wall Street Journal] say you [weren't aware that Mr. Malloch Brown's attack on the U.S. was appropriate.]  It's not only not appropriate, it's also illegal.  He should have been fired by Secretary-General Kofi Annan, who instead endorsed his remarks.

When I was an International Labour Organization lawyer I was responsible for the interpretation and application of the rules of conduct and reserve … which govern all U.N. officials. There is not the slightest question in my mind that Mr. Brown breached these rules with his talk.  And he breached the elementary rules of common sense and good judgement by attacking the U.S., the largest contributor, at a time when relations were already bad.

… Just how did his speech contribute to improving bad relations with the U.S.?  … to the capacity of the U.N. to execute its mission?

Is the U.N. now better off than it was before this speech?  Or has he made a major contribution to the acrimony and paralysis which are the lot of the U.N. for the rest of this year, and probably beyond?

At least his term, and that of Mr. Annan, end on Dec. 31."

"U.N.-becoming", letter from Frank Peel, Geneva, Wall Street Journal, June 14, 2006.

 

199a.    [Note: The above incident was hardly the first in which Mr. Malloch Brown provoked and angered UN Member States with an Annan-era theme of blaming them for the UN's many mismanagement scandals.]

"The Group of 77 [132 developing countries plus China] has complained to Secretary-General Kofi Annan that some of his senior officials continue to recklessly leak privileged information and to undermine the world body in public. …

Asked about the charges of 'management failings' in the U.N. Secretariat, [Mark] Malloch Brown told a TV interviewer last year: 'We have a hell of a structural problem.  The Security Council and member states generally interfere in the management of this organization.  They've not given the secretary-general the authority or the resources or the means to run a modern organization that can be held properly accountable to its membership.'

'We instead have a highly politicized interference in the day-to-day decision-making by ambassadors and their minions,' he said. …

The G 77 letter says … 'Such actions, in our view, are a clear contravention of … [UN staff rules and regulations and UN Charter provisions], which require the staff of the Secretariat … to be politically neutral and refrain from any action inconsistent with their status as international civil servants responsible to the Organization."

[The Group] urges him 'to ensure … that the officials concerned … desist from such practices with immediate effect.'"

Thalif Deen, "Senior U.N. officials under fire for reckless talk", Inter Press Service News Agency,  February 8, 2006.      [Further Note: On this very contentious core issue of UN Secretariat accountability and responsibility in 2006, please see paras. 185, 189, and 190 above and 204 below, and also paras. 88 and 92 in Overview Quotes … II.]

 

 

 

200.      "Not to be outdone by his own ruckus-raising deputy, United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan himself is now instructing the U.S. on how to treat the corruption-plagued, unreformed and unrepentant U.N.

… Apparently, America's power of the purse is quite acceptable if it entails forking out money with no reforms required.  If the US will only [cooperate] … says Annan, everyone … can 'turn down their rhetoric' and 'engage in serious negotiations' which will be used 'as a basis for more fundamental change,' which will happen 'later.'

For Kofi Annan, of course there's not a lot of 'later' left.  He is due to retire at the end of this year. … The [many UN] scandals are still with us.   But there has been no major reform. …

Mark Maloch Brown referred in his speech … to 'unchecked U.N. bashing' … which has become U.N. jargon for dismissing all criticisms. … But [the scandals] are sourced and documented, in some cases by Annan-appointed investigators.  The U.N.'s real problem today is … that one after another, allegations of U.N. misconduct, mismanagement, conflicts of interest, and corruption have turned out to be true.

What happens next is now up for grabs …"

Claudia Rosett, "The unreality of U.N. reform: What if 'later' never comes?", National Review Online (US), June 12, 2006.     [emphasis added]

                                                                                                                                                                       

 

201.      "East Timor's capital, Dili, … bears all the hallmarks of a city in crisis.  … Peacekeepers in body armour  … [machete-wielding gangs, and some 100,000 people] in makeshift refugee camps. …

Yet just two months ago … , Paul Wolfowitz, World Bank president, hailed [East Timor's] emergence from a bloody rupture with Indonesia in 1999 as 'a remarkable story.' …

So what has gone so wrong, so fast?  …

… The conflict is a graphic illustration of the deficiencies of a high-profile UN experiment in nation-building.  A saga of short-termism, ill-directed aid and conflicting priorities … [to caution] others who might seek to construct a country almost from scratch.

'There were a lot of crazy people around with … crazy ideas who were on this UN gravy train' says [a knowledgeable expert.] …

The UN's top man [admits] … the UN moved too quickly to downsize its peacekeeping presence … and withdraw from important institution-building work, despite signs that the situation on the ground remained 'fragile and fluid.'

'The way international assistance works is not at all conducive to sustained, long-term assistance', says [another deeply- involved] expert.  … 'The underlying root causes are often not attended to at all.'" 

Shawn Donnan, "East Timor: Dili dilemma: How blunders in building a nation are being brutally laid bare", The Financial Times (UK), June 12, 2006.    [emphasis added]

 

 

 

202.      "Far from being a beacon of justice to the countries of the world, the United Nations is 'in breach of its own human rights standards because of the unfair way it treats its own employees,' according to a … [new] report by an independent panel of three international jurists hired by [the UN] Staff Union to investigate the United Nations internal justice system.

The [panel] … was appointed after staffers repeatedly complained about abuse by their superiors in the organization and the lack of accountable bodies in which to air their grievances.

[British jurist Geoffrey Robertson, the panel head, who played a key role in such cases as that of the former Argentinian dictator Pinochet, described] … a system where everything is conducted 'under wraps and in secret,'. …[and] said justice is all but impossible for [UN] employees.  The existing structure 'is a sclerotic system that dates back to the League of Nations' he said, adding that he doubted it could be reformed under the current leadership of Secretary-General Annan.

"Reform has been on the U.N. agenda for over a decade, and there must be a real question over management resolve to progress it' the report said."

Benny Avni, "UN commits human rights abuses against its staff", New York Sun, June 13, 2006.     [emphasis added]    [Note: The full report is available on the home page of this website under "UN war crimes judge …".]

 


 

203.            "International aid agencies are struggling to raise funds to help victims of last month's central Java earthquake even as the rising economic cost and the number of people left homeless after the disaster puts it among the world's worst in recent history.

An assessment of the total damage and economic loss … … yesterday put the cost at $3.1 billion. …

UN officials originally estimated between 100,000 and 200,000 [people] were without accommodation, but 1.5 to 2 million people are now believed to be living in temporary shelter. Some officials believe the number of homeless could be even more than those in the tsunami. …

'We initially were looking at a completely different disaster,' said an NGO official.  … The funding we got at the beginning was for a completely different scenario.'

The lack of funds and the initial miscalculation of the number of homeless already appear to be affecting the international response.  … UN co-ordinators warned that only 14 of the 25 worst-affected sub-districts were receiving help with water and sanitation from non-governmental organizations."

Shawn Donnan, "Aid groups fight to raise cash as Java quake homeless toll soars", Financial Times (UK), June 15, 2006.    [emphasis added]

                                                                                               

 

 

204.      "Sir, as usual both Kofi Annan … and his English boxer, Mark Maloch Brown, have missed the point in personally attacking the US and other nations demanding results in UN reforms.  Mr. Annan has had two terms to fix the bureaucracy of the UN …

As a product of the UN system, the secretary-general is incapable of making the changes and reforms required.  As a consequence the US and other nations such as Japan are not only right but reasonable to withhold funds from an organization that cannot 'clean thyself.'

Mr. Annan and especially Mr. Brown would be doing a far better service to the UN if they spent their time fixing the system rather than attacking their major contributors personally.  That does not seem like a very clever strategy.  As one US taxpayer, I hope we continue to keep the UN on a close purse string until both its management and over-bloated bureaucracy are fixed."

"Annan should fix problems instead of attacking donors", letter from Michael P. Berry, Boston MA, The Financial Times (UK), June 16, 2006.

                                                                                               

 

 

205.      "The United Nations' efforts to seek justice for the 1999 atrocities in East Timor were plagued by mistakes and missteps, abandoned prematurely, and have contributed to the fragile state of the tiny country's fledgling judiciary, according to [a 140-page study written by David Cohen,] a leading expert on international war crimes tribunals …

[The] … report focuses on what it argues are failings by the UN, which ran a special 'hybrid' UN/local tribunal to hear 'serious crimes' cases … from June 2000 until May 2005.

'At the root of all the problems of the Serious Crimes process,' Mr. Cohen writes, 'was the failure by the UN to ensure leadership, a clear mandate, political will, and clear 'ownership' of the process from the very beginning.'

The report accuses the UN of a 'massive institutional failure … to create a judicial enterprise worthy of the values and standards that the United Nations represents.'"

Shawn Donnan, "UN criticized for its record on seeking justice in East Timor", Financial Times (UK), June 19, 2006.     [emphasis added]

                                                                                   

 

 

206.      "This hearing will focus on the continuing lack of transparency for the massive UN renovation project in Turtle Bay, Manhattan.  This is a follow up to last year's hearing, where the UN was called to account for wasted design money and a flawed and overpriced ($1.2 billion) plan.  Now the plan's cost projection has sky-rocketed to $1.7 billion, millions more have been spent on new designs, and an itemized cost projection is still not available.  The lack of transparency is a case study in the larger lack of transparency, accountability, financial and ethical integrity at the international body."

"U.N. headquarters renovation: No accountability without transparency", U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs: Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, …," [Washington, DC,]  6/20/06.   [emphasis added]    [Note: The full record of these hearings is available at hsgac.senate.gov under "Hearings". The US Government is to provide a massive loan for this UN "edifice complex." The detailed testimony, including that by Claudia Rosett and the US GAO is of particular interest - see also para. 189 and the following quote.]


 

 

207.      "'UN funding arrangements constrain the [Office of Internal Oversight Services'] ability to operate independently as mandated by the General Assembly and required by international auditing standards OIOS has adopted. … OIOS depends on the resources of the funds, programs, and other entities it audits.  The managers of these programs can deny OIOS permission to perform work or not pay OIOS for services.  UN entities could thus avoid OIOS audits and investigations, and high-risk areas can be and have been excluded from timely examination.'

Statement by David M. Walker, Comptroller General of the United States, "United Nations: International oversight and procurement controls and processes need strengthening", US General Accountability Office, April 27, 2006.

This situation is untenable and serves as an open invitation to those who may seek to defraud or abuse the system."

"The need for transparency: Evaluating the Capital Master Plan and UN reform", Statement of the Honorable John R. Bolton,  June 20, 2006, p. 6.    [emphasis added]

                                                                               

 

 

208.      "Not content with … amassing the biggest fortune in history, Bill Gates … wants to devote the rest of his life to giving it away. … That the moneyed are munificent is welcome, but that the best brains in business take the giving seriously matters, too.  Philanthropy, done well, is a serious undertaking.  Too often, the money is frittered away. …

… Philanthropy is good for doing all sorts of things governments fail at.  Free of the vicissitudes of votes and public opinion, philanthropists can take on causes that are unpopular or neglected.  They can innovate by promoting remedies that are otherwise unfeasible or remote. …

So applaud Mr. Gates' decision … With him around even more, the Gates Foundation, which already does a fine job, will do even better."  …

Capitalism has demonstrated that it is the best system for creating great fortunes.  More capitalists should show that it is the best for getting rid of them, too."

                        "Philanthropy: Give and make," The Economist, June 24th, 2006.

                                                                                                                               

208a.    "Warren Buffett, the legendary investor, has pledged to give … [most of] his $44 billion fortune to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation  … [to be] combined with its existing $35 billion assets, and Mr. Gates' own pledge to donate most of his remaining personal wealth, estimated at $50 billion. 

The Gates/Buffett endowment total still falls short of the annual amount of aid given by official bodies including the World Bank and rich governments, which totaled $106 billion in 2005.  But private foundations can sometimes achieve what official aid cannot. 

… Foundation resources … are flexible and can be committed over a long period without the political need to show results. …

The great successes of the Ford and Rockefeller foundations, for example, include supporting the agricultural research that drove the 'Green Revolution" in the 1960s and 1970s.

Similarly, the Gates foundation has carved out a dominant role in public health and particularly diseases like HIV-Aids and malaria, to which official aid was slow to respond. …

Mr. Buffett … yesterday hinted that several very rich but anonymous past business associates could soon follow his lead in giving large sums to charity."

Alan Beattie and Andrew Jack, "Duo take philanthropy to new heights", The Financial Times (UK), June 27, 2006.

 


 

209.      "I welcome Ibrahim Gambari's efforts to help Myanmar [Burma] … toward democracy … but he needs to understand the mindset of the Burmese generals.

[His] predecessor as the special UN envoy to Myanmar,] … Razali Ismail, came to be used as a mouthpiece for the Burmese regime.  Before each of Razali's visits to Myanmar, the regime released 10 to 20 political prisoners.  Razali praised … [these positive steps] … and hinted there would be … [political] dialogue, … but it never occurred.

As the regime's tactics became obvious … Razali was obliged to pressure the regime for real change, and the regime stopped allowing him to visit.

Similarly, Gambari thought that the generals … [wanted] change because they released … an activist …

But despite positive hints by the Burmese ruler, General Than Shwe, after Gambari's visit the regime extended the house arrest of the opposition leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, for another year.

As Gambari said, the diplomatic option is not working in Myanmar.  If the regime refuses to change the status quo, UN intervention is the option that we need to use.  Why try for another 10 years without progress?"

"The Burmese regime," letter from Htun Aung Gyaw, President, Civil Society for Burma, International Herald Tribune, June 26, 2006.     [emphasis added]    [Note: see also item 195 above.]

 

 

 

210.      "The General Assembly's budgetary committee today decided to lift the spending cap on the remainder of the United Nations' two-year fiscal period, authorizing Secretary-General Kofi Annan to utilize the remaining funds in the budget for 2006-2007.

Saying that not enough progress had been made in the reform of the Organization, the United States, Japan, and Australia [who together pay 43 percent of the assessed budget] dissociated themselves from the consensus decision to lift the cap, which stems from a December decision of Member States to limit … spending authorization to six months … pending significant progress on such reform. …

Mr. Annan has recently expressed optimism that the cap, backed by major donors and opposed by many developing countries, would be lifted since progress in UN reform is ongoing and the Organization is involved in too many crucial operations at the current time for the world to allow them to stall."

"General Assembly's budget committee lifts cap on UN spending," UN News service, 28 June 2006.     [Note: in the last few weeks preceding the June 30 spending cap deadline, Mr. Annan's report writers dumped eight management reform reports (in 215 pages) on the Assembly.  They included one that evaded the gross UN procurement scandal (see items 172, 177, 178 above) but, pressed by outside experts, promised to clean up the mess, and also a conceptual babble on accountability just like feeble reports made in 1992-1993 when the Assembly began pressing for decisive action.  The new accountability report did, however, shamefully conclude (14 years later) that "Little attention has been given … to holding the Secretariat accountable for achievement of results" (Add. 6, para. 38.)  See UN document A/60/846 and Adds. 1-7 at www.un.org/documents under "General Assembly", "Session documents".  See also item 200 above.]

                                                                                               


210a.            "Although the European countries have been at the forefront of calling for significant change at the United Nations, they have been unenthusiastic about trying to achieve it through the budget cap, and none of them joined in objecting to … [the General Assembly budget committee decision to lift the cap on spending.]

'The United Nations' ability to function and deliver services is imperative to the EU and, I believe to the rest of us,' said Gerhard Pfanzelter, the Austrian ambassador, speaking for the European Union. 

He said the United Nations had already achieved 'a remarkable amount of reform' and expressed regret at an 'atmosphere of polarization.'"

Warren Hoge, "UN spending cap lifted, minus support of U.S.", International Herald Tribune, June 30, 2006. [Note: Ambassador's Pfanzelter's statements blithely ignored all the poor delivery of 'imperative' UN services, the oil-for-food, refugee sex, and procurement scandals, and the endless unfulfilled reform intentions discussed in this set of Overview quotes..  The EU and its diplomats at the UN thus provide very poor governance and oversight, to the great detriment of the global taxpayers who must pay for all the mismanagement (diplomats do not pay such taxes), and all the desperate and suffering people worldwide who are not receiving the life-or-death support that the UN is supposed to provide. For serious UN performance problems of merely the three preceding weeks which the good Ambassador apparently missed, see again items 197b and c, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 205, 206, and 207.]

 


 

This chronology continues in 
Overview of IO Watch Archive Quotes IV